Enforcing Our Immigration Laws?

Monday, October 5, 2009
By Amy Alkon

Enforcing Our Immigration Laws?
It's a real problem for LA Times columnist Tim Rutten. In fact, he apparently thinks it's a terrible, unjust thing to do. He makes big boohoohoos in the LA Times about illegal immigrants (although he never refers to them that way) who got drop-kicked from jobs Americans could be taking. (Note the unemployment rate for citizens, Timster? You mention it in your column.) Rutten writes:

This week, unemployment among American workers climbed to its highest level in a quarter of a century. In parts of Los Angeles, joblessness has reached levels unmatched since the Depression. In many predominantly African American and Latino neighborhoods, nearly one in four people is out of work.

Yet the Obama administration has chosen this moment to deprive more than 1,800 Angelenos, nearly all Latino immigrants, of jobs that not only pay a living wage but provide health insurance and other benefits. The workers are employed by American Apparel, the largest employer in downtown L.A.'s garment district. The company and its workers are victims of a shift in federal law enforcement that began under George W. Bush and now has taken a particularly callous turn under President Obama.

The firings are taking place because the American Apparel workers were found to be using identity documents that federal immigration authorities have deemed illegitimate. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has called the firings "devastating."

"Deemed illegitimate"? Now, I guarantee that you won't say that about my "identity documents," like my birth certificate, social security card, and U.S. passport. I'm asked to present my passport and driver's license and sign a document when I do a paid TV appearance, because, just as in many or most countries around the globe, we require a person to have a permit or be a citizen to work in our country. Wow, what horrible fascist people we are.

| More from Amy Alkon

Stumble It!

Share/Save/Bookmark

  • Informative post.

    Wish I had time to write more - gotta work, lol.

    Steven
  • Brittanicus
    Its likely there is going to be a nasty battle ahead over comprehensive immigration reform? My thought is that instead of starting from scratch, like the open border insane society is demanding we should fabricate amendments into the 1986 Simpson Mazzoli bill. First and foremost the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), was full of loopholes. Its main content was to legalize guest workers, whose labor was mostly spent in agriculture. The problem that once legalized, they vanished from the fields and orchards, taking jobs on Main Street, stealing jobs from Americans. The numbers of illegal aliens escalated, because the perforated borders and limited border patrol agents led to floods of more foreign nationals skirting our national border.

    Farmers, agriculturists and businesses had to seek more workers once again, so the borders remained intentionally open thanks to Democrats and Republicans. So instead of the estimated 3.5 newcomers the actual figure was more like 5 million, with more crossing the inept border incessantly. Most of the new entrants lied about their period of residency and produced utility bills and other bogus documentation, including fraudulent affidavits. So the prior (INS) Immigration & Naturalization Service couldn't attempt to handle the overwhelming influx of illegal immigrants applying? Now President Osama and his Democratic happy faces want to swamp us yet again, with an estimated 20 plus illegal immigrants already squatting here? Even today the doors remain wide open, because the political parties under funded the real border fence, originally drafted by Rep. Duncan Hunter of California. His short 50 mile fence in San Diego, California is double tiered, with a no-mans-land between for border patrol vehicles to make their inspection tours.

    The fence that crosses America is--ONE STRAND BARRIER--and in many places doesn't exist at all, except for ailing cameras, sensors and other vehicle barriers? Now if the powers in Washington had any brains, they could amend the (IRCA) law? First is agriculture that wants Guest Workers to pick fruit and vegetables, they must be issued a special visa limited to a specific time. They cannot work outside that boundary and must return to their country of residence after the document expires. If they want at some point in time to qualify for permanent legal status, they must apply like all new immigrants through their embassy. There fingerprints and other data should be recorded just in case they disappear from the workplace and placed on an arrest list by ICE.
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Amy Alkon Archives

privacy policy | terms of service


Site Meter